Last Sunday, I was thinking about the first Mass reading, Acts 3:13–15 and 17–19:
It is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the God of our ancestors, who has glorified his servant Jesus whom you handed over and then disowned in the presence of Pilate after he had given his verdict to release him.
It was you who accused the Holy and Upright One, you who demanded that a murderer should be released to you while you killed the prince of life. God, however, raised him from the dead, and to that fact we are witnesses…
Now I know, brothers, that neither you nor your leaders had any idea what you were really doing; but this was the way God carried out what he had foretold, when he said through all his prophets that his Christ would suffer.
Now you must repent and turn to God, so that your sins may be wiped out.
Just imagine what a level of forgiveness was needed to say this, to address the crowd—the SAME crowd that not too long ago shouted “Crucify him! Crucify him!” condemning your beloved Master to death, spitting on him, hitting him, cursing him—with such gentleness.
And then I realized that everything that led up to Jesus’s death and resurrection had been necessary, INCLUDING the disciples’ cowardice. When the rubber finally met the road, they all ran away; Peter openly denied Jesus three times. What this taught them, though, was empathy and compassion for the moral frailty of others.
Without it, would they have been able to extend such kindness to the crowd they were to evangelize?
***
I couldn’t help but shed some tears when I saw this beautiful little YouTube Short of an elderly woman with Alzheimer’s who remembers only one thing…
***
I recently got a lesson from VatiGod about obedience. It was brought to my attention by a well-meaning friend and OCDS superior that my habit of harshly criticizing Pope Francis and the Church was unbecoming for an aspiring member of the lay Carmelite community.
She specifically named several blog posts in which I showcased the controversial “messages from God” by a small Texan faith community. The messages severely admonished the bishops as betrayers of the faith and their flocks, and accused the pope of being an illicit usurper of the seat of Peter. She also warned against taking a “too-apocalyptic view” of the Church and, in general, putting too much stock into private revelations.
As the naturally stubborn woman that I am, of course my first instinct was to launch into a lengthy argument. Emails flew back and forth.
“When does obedience to the pope become disobedience to God?” I ranted.
She wrote back,
It doesn’t. Obedience to the Pope doesn't become disobedience to God. That is the faith of the Catholic Church. It requires an accurate understanding of what is papal teaching, and even before that, a healthy ability to hear and listen to viewpoints that aren't ours, to hear the intention of another person. The latter is at least as important for us as the former, because this is how community life functions. Without openness to others and docility to hear and learn from others, we go around with hard armor surrounding our hearts, trying to do God's job, which is to keep us safe. Is it risky to be docile? It sure can feel that way. And it absolutely is dangerous when we are docile to not-God. But it is the Christian path to security. “Only in God is my soul at rest.”
“Yes, BUT,” I said, “what do you do when faced with heresy and/or false teachings coming from Church leaders? What are we going to do when they start allowing ‘trans women’ into female religious orders? Or when they say female deacons and priests are OK? Isn't it evil in itself to stand by and allow evil to happen? Shouldn't we stand up and fight?”
She replied,
“What are we going to do when” is a worry set in the future that doesn't exist. We pray for trust and the ability to live in the now with faith. Sharks gather where there is blood, and doubts and anxieties gather where we have breeches in our trust. THAT is precisely where we “fight.” We fight to have faith in God that He is the Truth and He had this crazy idea to have a Church. To know, with St. Therese, that I'm a little, helpless, needy child, for whom Abba is enough, even when we can't feel enough. To then experience Him enfolding us in our utter vulnerability. That is what Carmel aims at. To experience and to witness to. Because that is what this world so desperately needs.
Running the Church and governing the world are not our jobs. They are God's. It is probably one of the greatest tests of faith to look at the world and to still trust God, but this is why it is important to expend our energies seeking His face and owning our need. Knowing God, knowing self—that's the locus of the Carmelite battle.
I grudgingly had to admit that she had a point. Reading this now—about a month later—I’m actually stumped how much wisdom is in what she wrote, though I couldn’t see it in the heat of the moment. So I sought out Father D. for some spiritual direction…hoping, of course, that he would side with me.
During the session, I basically argued the same positions as before, but even as I did, I could feel that my conviction just wasn’t as strong anymore. I had no illusions: I KNEW that obedience was my greatest challenge and that, sooner or later, I’d have to do something about it.
Of all the things he said in that session, three stood out to me most.
First, he told me a story that uncomfortably reminded me of myself. He told me of a time when he himself had been such a boneheaded and opinionated know-it-all that, quitting a certain job, his boss was so glad that he left that he was the only employee who wasn’t sent off with a farewell party. No one even bothered saying goodbye on his last day. A really tough lesson to learn, he said, but a necessary one.
Here’s the second thing he said. Non-Catholics would ask him, “But what if the pope announces tomorrow, ex-cathedra, that homosexuality is totally okay and should be celebrated?”
His answer was, “That can never happen—because God won’t let it happen. Jesus himself founded the Catholic Church, and He promised that the gates of Hell would not prevail against it.”
I was stumped. “You really believe that?”
“Absolutely,” he said. And then he doubled down. “After all the research that I’ve done,” he said, “and all the Bible studies I’ve done, I’m convinced that it’s either the Catholic Church or there is no God.”
My jaw just about dropped to the floor. Wow. What an enormous faith he had.
It took a few days to sink in, but in the end, I had to admit it: It was me, not the Church that needed to change.
I’m still processing the whole thing and working on it… and I’m not expecting to “get really good at obedience” anytime soon. But the seeds are sown and watered. I pray to God that they may grow and bear fruit.
God bless you!
Sorry I’m riled up and can’t sleep now.
Something I wanted to mention is that “popesplainers”, those who like to blindly defend the popes actions regardless of how un biblical they may be, love to bring up the quote from Jesus when he tells Peter “you are the rock upon whom I will build my church”. Jesus never said “Peter you are the church”.
I have nothing but disdain for bergoglio for trying to destroy the church from within. What next? Female “deaconesses”? The only women who want that are feminazis and they only want that for one reason: power. And once they get their tentacles in the church, there’s no stopping them as we have seen in the secular world. It’ll be turned into a matriarchal circus. I’m sure Francis knows this and that’s exactly his plan.
Another is his synodal synodalities of synods or whatever, having the general public (of course they’ve been vetted to vote like he wants) voting on things that pertain to the church. The church is NOT a democracy. God is King and has the final say. And he already had the final say, so to go against Him is playing with literal fire. We don’t need a vote regarding gay lifestyle or female priests. Silly example of how I think Francis picked the laity: I’m going to hold a vote to see which is the best ice cream flavor in the world, chocolate or vanilla. I will then hold a meeting where I will invite 90% chocolate lovers and 10% pro vanilla (for good measure, you know, can’t make it obvious) and we will see what gets voted. ** eye roll**
Speaking of gay, the infamous FS document was penned by Tucho (of porn fame, what a surprise). If supposedly nothing has changed, then why even come out with such a divisive document and cause the uproar and confusion it caused? What was the necessity of it??
My take? He’s opening the door ever so slightly for a change in doctrine, whether through his papacy or the next (he’s chosen cardinals that align with his views.. again nothing suspicious there).
I once read a story about how to tame wild pigs, as a story on how people quietly lose their freedoms (or in this case, how they don’t notice how doctrine is slowly being changed) It went something like this: build one side of a fence around the wild pigs. Feed them corn. Eventually they get used to the fence and don’t mind it. Build side number two. Keep feeding them. Eventually they get used to that too. Before they know it, they’ve been corraled and are ready for the butcher. That’s how I see FS, and Francis tiptoeing around certain things. It is US who have to submit to God, not the other way around.
Regarding bashing bergoglio, I keep that to my Catholic audience only. The other denominations start talking about him and I walk away and don’t engage because then I will (I think) be found guilty of gossip. What’s the difference? I’ll tell you.
The Protestants (basically anyone non Catholic) are both right and wrong regarding the pope. They are wrong in not believing he is the leader of the one true church Jesus founded. He is. Whether he does what he is supposed to do is debatable (his job last I checked is to save souls, not worry about the weather but I digress).
They are, however, right in that he’s saying and doing things that any Christian would question, not just Catholics. And unfortunately I’m finding it harder and harder to defend him. He’s not making it easy.
(Add to that that now there is discord in the one true church between popesplainers and those of us who raise eyebrows and who’s blood pressure goes into hypertensive state every time he speaks, and we have a very serious dilemma. Granted I won’t leave Jesus because of Judas but heck, our fearless leader doesn’t help the situation. The world, Catholics in particular, need a strong leader, not one who leaves doubts)
However, I don’t engage with them because they have nothing good to say on any front and I’m not interested in their biased opinions. I discuss with other Catholics because they know (or I would hope they know) the predicament I find myself in regarding this particular pope.
I want some sort of guidance or explanation that makes sense and that I can reconcile. Can’t do it with the popesplainers who try to dismiss every erratic and heretical thing the pope does. Anyway, I went to confession a few weeks back because I ran my mouth with some colorful language to describe bergoglio. Like I said, I am NO fan of his. The priest gave me sound advice. Basically said to worry about what happens in my own home and follow the teachings of JESUS in the traditional Catholic Church. Have a relationship with Jesus. Don’t worry about what comes out of Rome and to have some charity. He’s right. So if I need to vent about Francis I do it in Catholic circles in the hopes that maybe I can be proven wrong with SOUND logic, not merely brushing heresies under the rug under the guise of “he’s pope”. So that’s how I reconciled some things. I like to stay informed of what’s coming out of Rome of course, but I refuse to let it affect me. He can answer for himself during his own final interview and I think I can say this with some certainty: I’d hate to be in his shoes.
Hi Ms. Shannara! Just finished working a night shift (nurse here) and the only thing that can keep me awake is one of your emails. Been meaning to write to you about some of them to get your perspective and just have intelligent Catholic dialogue with someone :)
I’ll write more when I have the time but I felt like I have to put my two cents here because I agree with you regarding “pope Francis”.
1. “The gates of hell will not prevail against the church”. Well the church is not the pope or a building, it’s the people. The people who use their God given intellect and common sense to detect when something is wrong. I’m sorry but the man has said and done enough to make me doubt his authenticity to the seat of Peter. Confusion does not come from God and the man is a master at confusing, almost to the point of making a mockery of the true faithful. He has also been quoted as saying he will go down as the one who divided the church. That does not sound like a benign innocent mistake to me, it sounds rather proud and arrogant and reeks of an ulterior motive and agenda not in line with Peter’s seat. That alone gave me caution, let alone everything else, with more coming out by the day.
2. Him picking Tucho Fernandez as his right hand man is also worrisome. The man wrote some nasty porn regarding our blessed mother and our savior. One thing is to be that sick in the head, something else is to go into graphic detail (meaning he marinated profusely on the ideas). And then have the nerve to publish it.
3. I’ve heard it said that priests and bishops can take souls to hell with them over false teachings. I’m sure the pope is not excluded. Martin Luther, Calvin, and everyone who has split from the Catholic Church I’m sure meant well. They thought they were doing the right thing. As a result, people who followed them in good faith probably ended up on the wrong side after this life. And if they didn’t, and ended up in heaven, then the words of Jesus weren’t true regarding the sacramentals. Can’t have it both ways.
All of this is to say, leader or not, I can’t follow blindly a man who has openly said and done things that go against my God. In the end it is Jesus who saves, not bergoglio. Not sure if during my final interview it’s ok to tell Jesus “I was obedient to him because you left him in charge even though your manual (the Bible) contradicted everything that man did.” Maybe Jesus will admonish me and tell me “then why did I give you an intelligence?”
Or maybe not. Maybe you and I are both wrong. But I’d rather play it safe and stick to traditional, unadulterated church teachings and the catechism according to tradition and not according to Francis.
One thing is a pope that says “do as I say and not as I do” (Borgias come to mind). Another is to say “screw what God wants. I’m in charge now!”
PS my family moved from Europe to Venezuela after the Second World War. We all know what happened to Venezuela and other South American countries. It happens when you put someone in power and it goes to their heads and they fancy themselves gods. It’s called a dictatorship. And Francis is behaving exactly like one. You don’t like him? He will defrock you if you’re a priest and close down anything even resembling tradition. Why is he so averse to what makes the heart of the faithful sing, such as the TLM and tradition of our ancestors? Why does it bother him so much? I prefer the novus or do masses myself, but if the TLM makes others feel closer to God, then it should be ok with him, but it’s not
Too many red flags for me…
Thanks for listening to my rant, hopefully it made some sense :) just my little opinion though